The University of British Columbia
UBC - A Place of Mind
The University of British Columbia Vancouver campus
Stigma and Resilience Among Vulnerable Youth Centre (SARAVYC)
  • Home
  • About
    • Investigators
    • Staff
    • Post-Docs and Research Assistants
    • Partners/Collaborators
  • Research
    • Current Projects
    • Completed Projects
  • Publications
    • Academic Publications
      • Journals
      • Books/Book Chapters
    • Reports
    • Infographics
    • Education Materials
  • Resources
    • List of Resources
    • Being Safe, Being Me 2019
    • Out at Home
    • Taking Pride
    • Talking About Healthy Relationships with 2SLGBTQ+ Youth
    • Witness Two Spirit
  • Get Involved
    • Job Postings
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Study Recruitment
    • Donate
» Home » 2020 » January » 28 » A National, Qualitative Study of Sexual Decision Making by Teenage Girls who are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or who have Another Nonheterosexual Identity

Publications

A National, Qualitative Study of Sexual Decision Making by Teenage Girls who are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or who have Another Nonheterosexual Identity

Objective

To address the significant dearth of literature that examines how girls who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or who have another nonheterosexual identity (LGB+) decide when and with whom to have sex; and to explore why inexperienced LGB+ girls might have sex with girls or boys.

Study design

We conducted 8 online, asynchronous, bulletin board-style focus groups with 160 adolescent girls 14-18 years of age. The transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis of each girls’ responses to the questions. Analyses were focused on increasing our understanding of sexual health decision making among LGB+ teenage girls (eg, “What was the reason you had sex for the first time?”). Participants’ responses reflected their day-to-day experiences and roles of cisgender LGB+ girls inside a dominant heteronormative social structure.

Results

Some LGB+ girls talked about the perception that LGB+ girls were presumed or expected to be hypersexual, and that they did not feel they could be accepted as LGB+ without being sexually active. Developmental aspects of identity were also salient: Girls considered or engaged in sexual encounters as a way of figuring out to whom they were attracted as well as confirming or disconfirming the identity labels they used for themselves. Same-sex encounters could be offered as “proof” that one really was LGB+. Similarly, unsatisfying experiences with guys could serve as evidence that they were not attracted to guys.

Conclusion

Sexual decision making among LGB+ girls is often driven by aspects of their sexual minority identity.

Ybarra M. L., Santana Parrilla J., Wolowic J., Rosario M., Goodenow C., Saewyc E. M. (2020). A National, Qualitative Study of Sexual Decision Making by Teenage Girls who are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or who have Another Nonheterosexual Identity. The Journal of Pediatrics, 217, 177-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.10.038.

SARAVYC is an international, multi-disciplinary, award-winning team that studies how resilience, stigma, discrimination, violence, and trauma affect young people’s health.
Donate to SARAVYC
Stigma and Resilience Among Vulnerable Youth Centre
Vancouver Campus
T222-2211 Wesbrook Mall
Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 2B5
Tel 604 822 7498
Website www.saravyc.ubc.ca
Email SARAVYC@nursing.ubc.ca
Find us on
    
Back to top
The University of British Columbia
  • Emergency Procedures |
  • Terms of Use |
  • Copyright |
  • Accessibility